truthpic.JPG (10631 bytes)

EDITORIAL

A year that shall be remembered for major league indoctrination via television programmes and newspaper interest in U.F.O.'s and the para-normal.

One of the most unfortunate factors about this televised interest that we have been seeing either in early morning programmes or evening slots is that a very mundane and repetitive Dr. Sue Blackmore, a psychologist lecturing at Bristol University, happens to be invited onto every show to give her thoroughly biased judgement (not opinion) on all subjects deemed supernatural.

It would appear, according to Dr.Blackmore that anybody who has ever seen a U.F.O. or been involved in an alien abduction, seen a ghost, experienced de-ja-vous or been enlightened by a near-death experience to name but a few, has in fact either hallucinated, let certain shadowy areas of the brain take over, or been affected by electricity pylons.

Well, now we know don't we!!! Next time you see a U.F.O. - check to see if you are near an electricity pylon. If you are not, slap yourself around the face a few times to stop hallucinating. If you are still witnessing something of the apparent supernatural kind, then it's high time you booked yourself in at your local clinic for a partial lobotomy!!!

Unfortunately, Dr.Blackmore was not aware that a good majority of the public were wide eyed and aghast with disbelief, not with the topics being discussed, but with her even-harder-to-believe reasonings to explain the phenomena. Another annoying little habit Dr.Blackmore persists in is ending her interviews/debates by saying very quietly, almost inaudibly -"But I could be wrong..." BRAVO! The fist sensible thing to be uttered!

What I want to know is why the television companies insist on using Dr.Blackmore as a -quote "Leading paranormal and U.F.O. investigator"? We all know that there are many, many more qualified and serious researchers out there who are just itching to present their evidence on television.

I, as well as others in this field have arrived at the conclusion that the general public is slowly being drip fed information on these subjects, and sooner rather than later, the real truth will become very obvious to all. Good luck, Dr.Blackmore!!!

Will 1995 be the year? Will the governments of the world finally come clean? I doubt that they will. Does it really matter? From the massive global increase in U.F.O. sightings to the ever-developing complexity of the Crop formations, there is a resulting feeling that the time draws near for a monumental change in consciousness. Whether or not this will come from a massive contact with a benevolent and spiritually advanced race from the stars - I could not say. Once again, we shall just have to wait and see.

What I am sure we are all aware of is that our primeval yearnings are returning, there is an almost tangible flow of power building up within the souls of the populace. Now is the time to unite and embrace each other, and magnify that power.

Paul Damon

[On the subject of the use of "Experts" on television programmes, I was distresssed to see two Astrononers used on the Network First UFO programme recently. They were discussing the Woodbridge/Bentwaters case and claimed that the lights were nothing more than the lighthouse reflecting through the clouds and confusing the airstaff on the bases.

I have stood on the entrance to Woodbridge airbase and watched the lighthouse beam turning on the horizon. It can be seen on most nights and it's position is well known to all local people and certainly airstaff, who sometimes use it to navigate by! How then would they mistake this beam, in it's frquency and position, for being a UFo which lands in the nearby woods? These experts ask more questions than they answer, but then they are the experts and seem to get invited on these programmes instead of those who have got brains. - MW]

SMALL FEATURE PREVIEW:

Pulitzer prize winner Prof. John E. Mack, spearheading the campaign to enlighten the world about alien abductions of human beings.

What is the driving force behind the man who is fast becoming a legend and an inspiration in UFO and abduction research?

In the next issue of Truth Seekers Review, our United States correspondent John Robinson reports on the growing movement of American citizens backing the cause for John Mack, and will bring the latest news and reports on Macks' investigations into the shadowy realm of abductions and implant devices.

Don't miss the next issue of Truth Seekers Review, place your order now!!

DETAILS ABOUT SUBSCRIPTION FROM CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESSES.

TRUTHSEEKRS REVIEW ISSUE 2 NOW AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET, IF YOU HAVEN'T GOT YOUR COPY WRITE TO US AND LET US KNOW. WE WILL SEND IT ON AUTOMATICALLY.

YOU MAY COPY THIS ISSUE FREELY AS LONG AS NO MONEY IS CHARGED FOR IT, AND IT IS NOT EDITED OR CUT IN ANY WAY. NORMAL COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS OTHERWISE APPLY.

(C) MATTHEW WILLIAMS & TRUTHSEEKERS REVIEW.


Return to the Truthseekers Edition 1 Index


Truthseekers Editorial Email: TRUTHSEEKERS@BTINTERNET.COM or  tr@truthseekers.freeserve.co.uk